Platform Rules — Content-Safety Taxonomy

Version 2.1 · effective 2026-07-27 · in force

This document is the operative content-safety catalog referenced by the Acceptable Use Policy in the "Terms of Service & Acceptable Use". The catalog below is version 1.1 of the platform's content-safety taxonomy (the taxonomy carries its own version, stated here so this document and the check that enforces it can be tied together). It is enforced by three moderation tools, each described as it actually operates:

RunMyB both builds apps from your request and hosts the public ones on a shared domain. To keep the platform and its users safe, every request is classified against the three-tier taxonomy below. The classifier judges what the app does, not merely what topic it mentions: an app that is about a hard topic in a legitimate way (recovery support, security education, journalism) is treated very differently from one that promotes or enables harm. The platform is designed so that when the check cannot tell, the request routes to a human reviewer rather than being auto-refused — that is the design posture the review flags implement, not a warranty that no borderline case will ever be refused.

Enforcement is graduated (a refusal to run, an unpublish, an account suspension, or termination), proportionate to the violation and any recurrence. Where we restrict a publicly-hosted app we provide a statement of reasons consistent with DSA Article 17, and you may appeal (see the "Notice-and-Action & Contact Points (DSA)" policy).

Tier A — Prohibited (always refused)

These are never permitted on RunMyB, and this tier is not configurable. A request that promotes or enables any of the following is refused with a reason:

Tier B — Adult / Restricted (refused at this stage)

These are restricted and refused at the platform's current stage. The strictness of individual Tier-B categories may be adjusted by RunMyB over time (for example, a future age-gated tier); Tier A is never adjustable.

Tier C — Flag for human review

These are sensitive topics that are frequently legitimate — the app is about the topic rather than promoting harm. Such a build may proceed, but a human reviewer at RunMyB reviews it before it can be published to the public showcase.

Ratings and earnings claims

Two conduct rules that apply on the platform's own surfaces, beside the app-content taxonomy above:

Business models the platform does not carry

Separate from the harm taxonomy above — which classifies content — the platform declines to carry certain business models at all, whatever their content rating:

Stated honestly, this list is enforced where a human looks: it is assessed at admission and at the human go-live review, and a hosted product found to operate one of these models may be unpublished under the enforcement section of the "Terms of Service & Acceptable Use". If you are unsure whether your business model is one of these, ask first: write to support@runmyb.com describing the model, and you will receive a recorded answer you can rely on.

Child safety

Where apparent child sexual abuse material is discovered in hosted content, RunMyB preserves the material and the associated records and reports to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) as US law (18 U.S.C. § 2258A) requires — the same commitment the "Terms of Service & Acceptable Use" states, repeated here because this catalog is where the prohibition lives.

Appeals

If your request is refused or flagged, you may appeal: send the decision reference (or a description of the decision) and why you disagree to support@runmyb.com, or use the contact points described in the "Notice-and-Action & Contact Points (DSA)" policy. An appeal is reviewed afresh by a human — never adjudicated by the automated check that produced the decision — and we aim to respond within 14 days. Nothing here waives our right to act immediately where the law requires it or where there is an imminent risk of serious harm.

Changes

This document is published, dated, and versioned; changes take effect on posting, with the version number, effective date, and changelog as the notice.

Version history (the document's changelog)

1.0 — initial draft edition; the enforcement taxonomy referenced by the Terms AUP. 1.1 — added the Tier-C spam/coordinated-inauthentic-behavior and undisclosed-advertising categories (the social-content module, 0432/E4). 2.0 — final edition: the draft banner removed and replaced with a neutral operative-catalog sentence; the taxonomy content unchanged (0529/E5). 2.1 — accuracy and completeness (effective on posting): the enforcement description corrected to say truthfully what runs where (the taxonomy classifier at build request; a static artifact-safety scan plus a human-review-flag block at the public-hosting flip; a daily re-scan of stored hosted bundles, disclosed as a moderation tool); the human-review sentence restated as the design posture it is; the taxonomy version stated (1.1) so the catalog and the check that enforces it are tied; new rules on fake ratings/reviews and deceptive earnings claims; a new section naming the business models the platform does not carry, with the ask-first route; the child-endangerment definition regains its beyond-CSAM qualifier so the categories do not overlap on their face; the appeal paragraph concretized (route, human review, response aim); the child-safety preservation-and-reporting sentence added (18 U.S.C. §2258A), matching the Terms.