Cookie & Tracker Notice

Version 3.1 · effective 2026-07-27 · in force

The short version: no consent banner

RunMyB does not set analytics, advertising, or cross-site tracking cookies. The cookies it does set — described exhaustively below — are the strictly-necessary sign-in and access cookies, plus one functional preference cookie (your workspace selection). Hosted product pages include a small cookieless first-party audience beacon that reports page views to the platform's own same-site endpoint; it stores nothing on your device — no cookies, no local storage — and what it processes is stated precisely below and in the Privacy Policy, Section 4, including the per-product switch that turns it off. Under the ePrivacy rule (Art. 5(3)), consent is required to store or read information on your device that is not strictly necessary; the platform's stored cookies are the exempt strictly-necessary and user-requested-preference kind, and its audience measurement operates under the commitments stated below. So there is no cookie consent banner.

What we do use

Where the console runs without sign-in, no cookie is set at all.

The visitor hash, stated in this notice and not only in the Privacy Policy. To count unique visitors without retaining identity, the collection endpoint derives a keyed hash server-side from the visitor's network address and browser signature, salted with a value that changes daily, and discards the raw values immediately — they are never logged and never stored. The daily salt makes the hash unlinkable across days. This mechanism uses signals every web server already receives, holds them only inside a single request, and reduces them to a day-scoped counter input; it does not build a device profile, and that — not a bare assertion — is why we say the beacon does no fingerprinting.

The commitments the no-banner posture rests on, as our own obligations rather than a citation: the beacon produces aggregates only; it does no cross-site tracking; its output is not consolidated with other data about you; retention is bounded (aggregate counts, no raw identifiers); and every hosted product has a per-product opt-out that turns the beacon off entirely. The French CNIL's guidance on strictly-aggregate first-party audience measurement supports this posture; the commitments above are ours and stand on their own. The 2.0 edition of this notice promised that introducing any tracker would be preceded by an update to this notice; the 3.0 update was that promised update for the audience beacon, published before the beacon served. If we ever introduce a tracker that requires consent, that change re-triggers a consent requirement and this notice will again be updated first.

Changes

This notice is published, dated, and versioned. It does not require your acceptance; it is informational.

Version history (the document's changelog)

1.0 — initial draft edition. 2.0 — final edition: names the strictly-necessary cookies actually set (the console session cookie; the hosted edge's sign-in session cookies); final register (0529/E5). 3.0 — names the cookieless first-party audience beacon in hosted product pages and narrows the former blanket we-read-nothing claim honestly (the beacon reads the page context it runs in — the visited page's address and the referring page — and still sets no cookies and uses no storage); this update itself fulfils the update-this-notice-first promise recorded in 2.0 (0537). 3.1 — completeness and candour corrections (effective on posting): two cookies the platform sets are now named — the console's workspace-selection preference cookie and the hosted-preview access cookie on product domains — and the opening no longer claims the set is sign-in cookies only; the beacon's hash inputs are now named in this notice (network address and browser signature), matching the Privacy Policy; what the beacon reports (page views including in-app navigations) and what is kept server-side (host, referrer host, day-scoped visitor hash — the path is dropped) are stated precisely; the no-banner conditions are stated as our own commitments with the CNIL guidance as supporting context; the no-fingerprinting claim restated in its reasoned form.